Admitted in Hawaii & New York
Over 20 Years of Litigation Experience
Martindale Hubbell's Highest Legal/Ethical Rating
Listed in Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers
Listed in Best Lawyers in America

Hawaii Attorney Legal Blog

The Law Offices of Philip R. Brown

Tuesday, September 05, 2006

Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices in Hawaii

Hawaii Revised Statutes § 480-2 provides a powerful tool to protect investors or consumers who have been injured by misleading or deceptive advertising. The Hawaii Supreme Court has concluded that if advertising has a "capacity to mislead" it may violate the Hawaii Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

The reason this tool is so helpful to investors or consumers is two-fold. First, it is much easier to prove a violation of H.R.S. § 480-2 than it is to prove a claim of fraud. Unlike a fraud claim, to prevail in a H.R.S. § 480-2 case, the victim does not have to demonstrate that the advertiser intended to mislead the consumer. Indeed, the consumer must only demonstrate that the advertising has a "capacity to mislead." A far easier standard of proof.

The second reason H.R.S. § 480-2 is so important in the protection of Hawaii consumers is the damages that are recoverable. An investor or consumer injured under H.R.S. § 480-2 may recover actual damages trebled (multiplied by three), attorneys fees and costs. Obviously, when faced with the prospect of paying treble damages and attorneys fees, a company in Hawaii should be highly motivated to truthfully advertise its products. As such, H.R.S. § 480-2 is a vital weapon in the fight for truth in advertising.

Labels: , , ,

posted by PhilBrown at 6:12 PM

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

© Copyright 2006-2008. All rights reserved.